Aller au contenu
Adrien Lacour Studio

A team page that reads as one company, not a patchwork.

Directed AI portraits for a distributed team, produced with AI, directed by me. Consistency held across the full set, individual consent per person. No shoot to schedule, no calendars to align.

Ten portraits, delivered on the same day, that belong together.

If you have been comparing tools for consistent team headshots, the hard part is not producing ten images. It is holding one direction across all ten.

AI platforms produce images. They do not know your brand, they do not discard the results that miss, and they do not hold consistency across ten portraits delivered on the same day. Those are three separate judgments, and all three are mine.

One in five AI results is not usable: distortion, inconsistency, an expression that reads wrong. On a contact sheet, the eye keeps the right frame and drops the rest. That sorting is part of what I deliver, not part of your work.

If that sounds abstract, how I define consistency across a set spells out what is actually being held from one portrait to the next.

Contact sheet of three takes of the same portrait from a studio production: the center frame is kept, the two others are dropped at the sorting stage.
Kept
A contact sheet from the studio: three takes of one portrait, two dropped at the edit, one kept. Produced with AI, directed by hand.

Nine people, one direction, held.

This board ran on the exact brief a team order runs on: same background, same light, same framing and same rendering, across nine people who share nothing else. On a real order, each portrait starts from that person's own photos instead of a fictional subject. The direction does not move.

Corporate portrait of a woman in her fifties, thin metal glasses, navy suit, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a man in his thirties, curly hair and short beard, light blue oxford shirt, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a woman in her forties, terracotta blazer over an ecru top, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a man in his sixties, round glasses, grey tweed jacket, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a young red-haired woman, forest green blouse, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a man in his forties, charcoal suit without a tie, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a woman in her thirties, cream blazer, small earrings, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a young blond man, navy polo under a jacket, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Corporate portrait of a woman in her sixties, white bob, burgundy jacket, grey studio background (demonstration, fictional person).
Produced with AI, directed by hand. All nine people are fictional, produced without any starting photograph. No real models, no clients. Like every visual on this site, this board demonstrates the method, not a client roster.

Each person still has to look like themselves.

A model optimizes for a plausible face, not for a specific one. Left alone, it drifts. Correction happens on my side, before anything reaches you. If a portrait does not read as the person, it does not ship.

One revision round is included, and every person validates their own image before delivery. I do not promise a specific outcome. I direct, I sort, and I show you what I would put my name on.

The same corporate portrait declined in three framings, close-up to waist-up, the face staying identical across all three.
One direction, three framings. The face has to hold across every one of them, or none of them ship. Produced with AI, directed by hand.

Every person pictured consents directly, not through their employer.

When a company orders portraits for a team, the people in those portraits are not the ones signing the order. That gap is where most of the legal risk sits, in the United States more than anywhere.

So the consent flow does not run through you. Each person receives their own link, gives written consent, and uploads their own reference photos. Written, timestamped, per person. Your files sit under GDPR, in the EU, and are deleted 30 days after the project closes.

The details are in my privacy and data policy and the list of subprocessors.

Who this works for, and who it does not.

A good fit

Companies with a distributed team and a team page that reads as a patchwork. Founders and executives whose visual presence has not kept up with their positioning.

Not a fit

One person looking for a single profile photo at product prices. There are products for that, and I am not competing with them. Buyers comparing on price alone: the direction is the product here, and it does not compress.

Last reviewed:

Bring your team page up to where the company is.

Five lines about your team is enough. I come back within one business day with a scoped estimate.

One business day, and a straight answer either way.